扶摇AI知识笔记AI 前沿知识库
智能体应用

ToMAS: A Pilot Failure-Grounded Theory-of-Mind Benchmark from Multi-Agent LLM Failures

来源:arXiv cs.MA 论文速递 约 1999 字 llmmulti-agentrsi
arXiv cs.MA
转载

本文转载自 arXiv cs.MA,版权归原作者及原发布平台所有。本站仅作知识整理与转载分享,如涉版权问题请联系客服删除。

01核心要点

  • LLM-based multi-agent systems can fail even when communication succeeds because agents do not correctly track their peers' roles, knowledge, or intentions.
  • We investigate whether such inter-agent misalignment cases, labelled FC2 in MAST-Data, can be converted into functional partner-state reasoning items.
  • ToMAS applies four explicit convertibility criteria to diagnosed execution traces.

02正文全文

Abstract:LLM-based multi-agent systems can fail even when communication succeeds because agents do not correctly track their peers' roles, knowledge, or intentions. We investigate whether such inter-agent misalignment cases, labelled FC2 in MAST-Data, can be converted into functional partner-state reasoning items. ToMAS applies four explicit convertibility criteria to diagnosed execution traces. A full conversion pass over 242 eligible non-AG2 training traces produced 39 CLEAN items. In an 18-trace reliability pilot, two annotators achieved 94.4% raw agreement and Cohen's kappa = 0.92. We then used the converted items as binary rewards in a small-scale GRPO feasibility experiment with Qwen2.5-1.5B. On a 28-item held-out Magentic GAIA diagnostic, every evaluated condition exceeded the ROUGE-L threshold on the same 2 of 28 items. Post-hoc adapter checks show why: under the learning rate used, the LoRA update remained numerically negligible (max abs Delta W about 7e-6), so all conditions decode identically to the untrained checkpoint. The experiment therefore does not show a training effect and cannot establish one; it reports an executable pipeline together with two limitations that any conclusive study must address: a provenance gap between the training and evaluation items, and lexical-overlap scoring. ToMAS provides a preliminary rubric and pipeline for converting diagnosed coordination failures into trainable partner-state reasoning items and identifies the requirements for a conclusive matched-domain evaluation.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

03原文直达

本文内容转载自 arXiv cs.MA,如需查看原排版、配图与最新修订,请访问原始出处。

阅读原文(arXiv cs.MA)

下载论文 PDF

正在校验阅读权限…
RELATED

相关阅读

更多 智能体应用