扶摇AI知识笔记AI 前沿知识库
首页 / 产业观察 / 正文
产业观察

Reporting Practice Matters: The Impact of Reference Choice on Chest X-ray Report Evaluation

来源:arXiv cs.AI 论文速递 约 2074 字
arXiv cs.AI
转载

本文转载自 arXiv cs.AI,版权归原作者及原发布平台所有。本站仅作知识整理与转载分享,如涉版权问题请联系客服删除。

01核心要点

  • Radiologists follow heterogeneous reporting practices.
  • Two radiologists examining the same image and identifying the same clinical findings might nevertheless compose superficially distinct reports, varying in terminology, shorthand, formatting, and level of detail.
  • These variations in reporting norms represent an under-appreciated obstacle in efforts to evaluate AI-based radiology report generation (RRG) models, where machine-generated reports are typically assessed based on their concordance with human-generated references.

02正文全文

Abstract:Radiologists follow heterogeneous reporting practices. Two radiologists examining the same image and identifying the same clinical findings might nevertheless compose superficially distinct reports, varying in terminology, shorthand, formatting, and level of detail. These variations in reporting norms represent an under-appreciated obstacle in efforts to evaluate AI-based radiology report generation (RRG) models, where machine-generated reports are typically assessed based on their concordance with human-generated references. In this paper, we quantify the sensitivity of established evaluation metrics to variations in reporting practices, revealing impacts large enough to alter the rankings of models. We introduce a radiologist-informed taxonomy of variations in radiology reporting practice and a method (ReRef) that rewrites reference reports along the axes of our taxonomy while preserving clinical interpretation. For instance, when comparing the performance of nine RRG models on MIMIC-CXR using RadCliQ-v1, condensing the discussion of normal findings in the reference reports causes Libra to drop from first to second place while CheXOne rises from third to first. Our results suggest that many current metrics fail to decouple clinical interpretation from conformity to reporting practices and that choosing the ``right'' references that accurately reflect the desired reporting practices can be important in practice. To support future research, we release MIMIC-CXR-Ext-ReRef, a radiologist-validated dataset of 120 (original, alternative) reference report pairs derived from MIMIC-CXR.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

03原文直达

本文内容转载自 arXiv cs.AI,如需查看原排版、配图与最新修订,请访问原始出处。

阅读原文(arXiv cs.AI)

下载论文 PDF

正在校验阅读权限…
RELATED

相关阅读

更多 产业观察