扶摇AI知识笔记AI 前沿知识库
首页 / 产业观察 / 正文
产业观察

Anchored Sequential Deliberation

来源:arXiv cs.MA 论文速递 约 2380 字
arXiv cs.MA
转载

本文转载自 arXiv cs.MA,版权归原作者及原发布平台所有。本站仅作知识整理与转载分享,如涉版权问题请联系客服删除。

01核心要点

  • Sequential deliberation is a mechanism for collective decision making: at each round, a uniformly randomly selected pair is asked to revise a collective outcome, which then becomes the reference point for the next round.
  • Existing theory by Fain et al.
  • ~\cite{fain2017sequential} treats the current outcome solely as the disagreement alternative in bargaining.

02正文全文

Abstract:Sequential deliberation is a mechanism for collective decision making: at each round, a uniformly randomly selected pair is asked to revise a collective outcome, which then becomes the reference point for the next round. Existing theory by Fain et al.~\cite{fain2017sequential} treats the current outcome solely as the disagreement alternative in bargaining. Yet an existing draft, policy, or proposal might carry social influence and anchor participants' expressed positions toward the status quo.

We introduce anchored sequential deliberation on a one-dimensional decision space. In each round, two participants with bliss points $U$ and $V$ shift their positions toward the previous outcome $O_{t-1}$ with anchoring strength $\lambda$, then Nash-bargain using $O_{t-1}$ as the disagreement alternative. The update simplifies to $O_t=(1-\lambda)\mathsf{Median}\{U,V,O_{t-1}\}+\lambda O_{t-1}$.

We establish a convergence--stability trade-off. For every population distribution and $\lambda<1$, the process has a unique stationary distribution. A monotone coupling yields a $1$-Wasserstein contraction factor of at most $\frac{1+\lambda}{2}$ and at least $\lambda$; thus, stronger anchoring slows mixing. On the other hand, stationary social cost weakly decreases with $\lambda$, although the worst-case distortion remains $\frac{1+\sqrt{2}}{2}$. We also identify a unique \emph{deliberative fixed point}, where the expected unanchored movement is zero, and prove that the stationary distribution concentrates around it as $\lambda \to 1$. For the uniform population, stationary distortion lies between $1+\frac{1-\lambda}{9+7\lambda}$ and $1+\frac{1-\lambda}{6(1+\lambda)}$, with both bounds approaching $1$ as $\lambda\to1$. Simulations for uniform and Beta populations show that stronger anchoring slows mixing, concentrates the stationary distribution, and lowers stationary distortion in these instances.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

03原文直达

本文内容转载自 arXiv cs.MA,如需查看原排版、配图与最新修订,请访问原始出处。

阅读原文(arXiv cs.MA)

下载论文 PDF

正在校验阅读权限…
RELATED

相关阅读

更多 产业观察